Skip to main content
Log in

Farmers' preferences and use of local fodder trees and shrubs in Kenya

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indigenous fodder trees and shrubs are now receiving increased research attention. Systematic information from farmers about the species they use is, however, scanty. The objective of this study was to find out farmers' ranking of local fodder tree species of their choice; their criteria for assessing fodder trees; how the most preferred species rated on each criterion; species' uses, management, and ways of establishment; and implications of these results for the design of similar studies in the tropics. The study consisted of informal and formal surveys in three agroecological zones with mean annual rainfall of 775, 950 and 1300 mm, respectively. Farmers used an indigenous board game, bao, to rank species. Improved, stall-fed dairy animals were the dominant livestock type in the subhumid zone whereas communally-grazed, local-breed cattle and goats were common in the dry zone. A total of 160 different local fodder trees and shrubs were used by farmers in the three zones. The three most preferred species in the subhumid zone were Triumfetta tomentosa, Commiphora zimmermanii, and Bridelia micrantha; in the medium zone, Aspilia mossambicensis, Lantana camara, and Grewia tembensis, and in the low zone, Melia volkensii,Crotalaria goodiiformis, and A. mossambicensis. In the subhumid zone, the most frequently mentioned criteria were the ability of the fodder to satisfy hunger and contributions to animal health. Palatability and drought resistance of the tree were the most important criteria in the medium zone and, effect on the condition of the animal and palatability were most important in the dry zone. Farmers' ratings on palatability for cattle and goats, and milk production for goats differed significantly among tree and shrub species (P < 0.05). The study has helped identify species for further research and development activities, with the aim of improving their productivity and disseminating them among farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antilla LS, Johansson GM and Johansson SG (1994) Browse preference of Orma livestock and chemical composition of Prosopis juliflora and nine indigenous woody species in Bura, Eastern Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, Special Issue 58: 83-90

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, W (1990) Use of browse by Fulani cattle in central Nigeria. Agrofor Syst 12: 217-228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourie N, Lugt JJ van der, Newsholme SJ and Nel PW (1987) Acute Lantana camara toxicity in cattle. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 58(4): 173-178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Hitimana L and Akyeampong E (1995) Farmer participation in on-station tree species selection for agroforestry: a case study from Burundi. Expl Agric 31: 27-38

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S, Arimi H, Murithi F and Karanja J (1996) Boosting milk production and income for farm families: the adoption of Calliandra calothyrsus as a fodder tree in Embu District, Kenya. In: Mugah JO (ed) Proceedings of the First Kenya National Agroforestry Conference on People and Institutional Participation in Agroforestry for Sustainable Development, pp 421-438. Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Maguga, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugerud A and Collinson MP (1990) Plants, genes, and people: Improving the relevance of plant breeding in Africa. Expl Agric 26: 341-362

    Google Scholar 

  • Heering JH and Gutteridge RC (1992) Sesbania sesban (L.) Merrill. In: Mannetje L't and Jones, RM (Ed) Plant Resources of South-East Asia, No. 4, Forages, pp 198-201, Pudoc-DLO, Wageningen, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivory DA (1990) Major characteristics, agronomic features, and nutritional value of shrubs and tree fodders. In: Devendra C (ed) Proceedings of a Workshop on Shrubs and Tree Fodders for Farm Animals, pp 22-38, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RJ and Lowry JB (1984) Australian goats detoxify the goitrogen 3-hydroxy-4(1H) pyridone (DHP) after rumen infusion from an Indonesian goat. Experienta 40: 1435-1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanzila M (1994) Survey of browse trees in Burundi, Rwanda and Zaire. Revue d'elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux 47(4): 415-424

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprey HF, Herlocker DJ and Field CR (1980) Report on the state of knowledge on browse in East Africa in 1980. In: Le Houérou HN (ed) 1980. Browse in Africa-the Current State of Knowledge, pp 33-54. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison BJ, Gold MA and Lantagne DO (1996) Incorporating indigenous knowledge of fodder trees into small-scale silvopastoral systems in Jamaica. Agrofor Syst 34: 101-117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munyua SJA., Njenga MJ, Karitu TP, Kimoro C, Kiftoon JE and Buoro IBJ (1990) A note on clinical-pathological findings and serum enzyme activity in sheep, goats and Fresian calves with acute Lantana camara poisoning. Bull Anim Hlth Afr 38: 275-279

    Google Scholar 

  • Nochebuena G and O'Donovan PB, 1986. The nutritional value of high protein forage from Gliricidia sepium. World Anim Rev 57: 48-49

    Google Scholar 

  • Odenyo AA, Osuji PO, Karanfil O and Adinew K (1997) Microbiological evaluation of Acacia angustissima as a protein supplement for sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 65: 99-112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley BW and Brokensha D (1988) The Mbeere in Kenya Volume II-Botanical Identities and Uses. Institute for Development Anthropology, University Press of America, London, 348 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roothaert RL and Paterson RT (1997) Recent work on the production and utilization of tree fodder in East Africa. Animal Feed Science and Technology 69: 39-51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusten EP and Gold MA (1991) Understanding an indigenous knowledge system for tree fodder via multi-method on-farm research approach. Agrofor Syst 15: 139-165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd G (1989) Putting trees into the farming system: land adjudication and agroforestry on the lower slopes of Mount Kenya. Network Paper 8a, Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart C, Lamberton JA, Fairclough RJ and Pass MA (1988) Vaccination as a possible means of preventing lantana poisoning. Australian Veterinary Journal 65(11): 349-352

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JL, Allison GE and Simons AJ (eds) (1996) Gliricidia sepium-Genetic resources for farmers. Tropical Forestry Papers No. 33. Oxford Forestry Insititute, University of Oxford, UK, 125 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland A, Ouma J and Ndubu J (1995) Farming in Mbeere. Report of an Informal Diagnostic Survey of the Farming Systems of Lower Embu, Kenya. Volume 1. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Research Centre Embu, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, B, Walker, DH and Sinclair, FL (1997). Indigenous knowledge of the feeding value of tree fodder. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67: 97-114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne PJ, Subba DB, Walker DH, Thapa B, Wood CD and Sinclair FL (1999) The basis if indigenous knowledge of tree fodder quality and its implications for improving the use of tree fodder in developing countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology 81: 119-131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen HJC, Murithi FM, Nyaata OZ, Mwangi JN, Aiyelaagbe IOO and Mugendi DN (1993) Report on an ethnobotanical survey of woody perennials in the coffee zone of Embu District, Kenya. AFRENA Report no. 62, ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roothaert, R.L., Franzel, S. Farmers' preferences and use of local fodder trees and shrubs in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 52, 239–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011896921398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011896921398

Navigation